MICHAEL
SHERMER: SCIENCE AND THE
PSYCHOLOGY OF BELIEFS
Introduction
Michael Shermer is mainly
interested in understanding
how science works as a system
of thought, as a social
system and as a psychology
of beliefs. His general
field of study is in the
social sciences, and particularly
how belief systems work.
As the man behind SKEPTIC
Magazine, and Director of
the Skeptics Society, he
notes that his "engagement
with the paranormal, pseudoscience,
fringe groups, cults and
all sorts of wacky, X-files
stuff is not just to debunk,
but to understand belief
systems on the fringes work,
in order to understand how
science works, and how mainstream
beliefs work. Shermer works
the edges, the fringes,
what he calls " the borderlands
and the nonsense stuff."
In 1992 he founded Skeptic
Magazine with a circulation
1,000, and now it's up to
about 40,000. Ultimately
Shermer wants to reach half
a million readers, like
Scientific American, but,
he notes, "that's a bit
of a reach because selling
ideas is much harder than
selling personalities and
celebrities".
—
JB
MICHAEL
SHERMER is the Founding
Publisher of Skeptic magazine,
the Director of the Skeptics
Society, a monthly columnist
for Scientific American,
the host of the Skeptics
Lecture Series at Caltech,
and the co host and producer
of the 13-hour Fox Family
television series, Exploring
the Unknown.
Shermer is the author of
How We Believe: The Search
For God In An Age Of Science;
Why People Believe Weird
Things; and Teach
Your Child Science. He
is the coauthor of Denying
History: Who Says The Holocaust
Never Happened and Why Do
They Say It? and
Teach Your Child Math And
Mathemagics.
He has appeared on such
shows as 20/20, Dateline,
Charlie Rose, Tom Snyder,
Donahue, Oprah, Sally, Lezza,
Unsolved Mysteries, and
other shows, as well as
on documentaries aired on
A & E, Discovery, and The
Learning Channel.
LINK: The
Skeptics Society
SCIENCE
AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF BELIEFS
EDGE: Why are you playing
the edges; why bother to
debunk, why spend your time
exposing people that are
outright frauds, phonies,
or who are merely self deluded?
MICHAEL SHERMER: Because
it gives us better insight
into Karl Popper's discussion
of the demarcation problem;
that is, where do we draw
the line between science
and non- or pseudoscience?
It turns out that it's a
very complex problem. Popper's
answer to that question
was that of false viability,
what is the result when
you put something to an
empirical test? Well that's
nice, but what do you do
with string theory then?
It's never been tested,
probably can't be tested,
yet it's mathematically
elegant and theoretically
beautiful. Is that science?
How about consciousness
research? The kind of thing
that people like Dan Dennett
and Pat and Paul Churchland
do — is that philosophy,
metaphysics, or science?
That kind of research is
in a gray, borderland area.
How about hypnosis? There's
a whole range of claims
that people don't really
question as to what they
are and analyzing those
claims helps us gain insight
into how science works.