Home
About Edge
Features
Edge Editions
Press
Edge Search
Subscribe




2008

"WHAT HAVE YOU CHANGED YOUR MIND ABOUT?"

Back to Index Version

CONTRIBUTORS


Alan Alda
Stephon Alexander
Chris Anderson
Scott Atran
John Baez
Simon Baron-Cohen
Mary Catherine Bateson
Patrick Bateson
Gregory Benford
Jesse Bering
Jamshed Bharucha
Roger Bingham
Susan Blackmore
Adam Bly
David Bodanis
Lera Boroditsky
Nick Bostrom
Stewart Brand
David Brin
Rodney Brooks
David Buss
William H. Calvin
Philip Campbell
Nicholas Carr
Sean Carroll
Leo Chalupa
Nicholas A. Christakis
George Church
Steve Connor
Helena Cronin
Austin Dacey
David Dalrymple
Paul Davies
Richard Dawkins
Aubrey de Grey
Francesco De Pretis
Stanislas Dehaene
Daniel C. Dennett
Keith Devlin
Chris DiBona
Denis Dutton
Esther Dyson
Freeman Dyson
George Dyson
Daniel Engber
Brian Eno
Juan Enriquez
Jeffrey Epstein
Daniel Everett
Paul Ewald
Todd Feinberg
Helen Fisher
Ken Ford
Howard Gardner
James Geary
David Gelernter
Neil Gershenfeld
Gerd Gigerenzer
Daniel Gilbert
Marcelo Gleiser
Rebecca Goldstein
Daniel Goleman
Beatrice Golomb
David Goodhart
Brian Goodwin
Alison Gopnik
Linda S. Gottfredson
Jon Haidt
Diane Halpern
Haim Harari
Judith Rich Harris
Sam Harris
Marc D. Hauser
Marti Hearst
Roger Highfield
W. Daniel Hiliis
Donald Hoffman
John Horgan
Nicholas Humphrey
Piet Hut
Marco Iacoboni
Xeni Jardin
George Johnson
Alan Kay
Daniel Kahneman
Kevin Kelly
Marcel Kinsbourne
Gary Klein
Bart Kosko
Stephen Kosslyn
Kai Krause
Lawrence Krauss
Andrian Kreye
Ray Kurzweil
Jaron Lanier
Leon Lederman
Joseph LeDoux
Janna Levin
A. Garrett Lisi
Seth Lloyd
Gary Marcus
John McCarthy
Thomas Metzinger
Geoffrey Miller
Oliver Morton
David Myers
PZ Myers
Steve Nadis
Randolph M. Nesse
Tor Nørretranders
James O'Donnell
Tim O'Reilly
Hans Ulrich Obrist
Mark Pagel
John Allen Paulos
Irene Pepperberg
Steven Pinker
Jordan Pollack
Ernst Pöppel
Carolyn Porco
Robert Provine
Eduardo Punset
Lisa Randall
Martin Rees
Ed Regis
Carlo Rovelli
Rudy Rucker
Douglas Rushkoff
Karl Sabbagh
Paul Saffo
Scott Sampson
Robert Sapolsky
Dimitar Sasselov
Roger Schank
Stephen Schneider
Peter Schwartz
Gino Segre
Charles Seife
Martin Seligman
Terrence Sejnowski
Robert Shapiro
Rupert Sheldrake
Michael Shermer
Clay Shirky
Lee Silver
Barry Smith
Laurence Smith
Lee Smolin
Dan Sperber
Paul Steinhardt
Linda Stone
Seirian Sumner
Nassim Nicholas Taleb
Timothy Taylor
Max Tegmark
Arnold Trehub
Robert Trivers
Colin Tudge
Sherry Turkle
Yossi Vardi
J. Craig Venter
David Sloan Wilson
Frank Wilczek
Lewis Wolpert
Richard Wrangham
Anton Zeilinger

2007

"WHAT ARE YOU OPTIMISTIC ABOUT"



What Are you Optimistic About?
Edited by John Brockman
Introduction by Daniel C. Dennett



Was läuft hier richtig?
Der neue Optimi

smus der Wissenschaften kommt gerade zur rechten Zeit
RALF BÖNT


C'est la double question posée par John Brockman, éditeur de Edge à plus de 160 "penseurs de la troisième culture, ces savants et autres penseurs du monde empirique qui, par leur travail ou leurs écrits prennent la place des intellectuels traditionnels en rendant visibles les sens profonds de nos vies, en redéfinissant autant qui nous sommes que ce que nous sommes".

Ça change des unes constamment catastrophiques de nos médias habituels.


But when the scientific thinkers look beyond their own specializations to the big picture, they continue to find cause for cheer — foreseeing an end to war, for example, or the simultaneous solution of our global warming and energy problems. The most general grounds for optimism offered by these thinkers, though, is that big-picture pessimism so often proves to be unfounded.
Global warming, the war on terror and rampant consumerism getting you down? Well, lighten up: here, 17 of the world's smartest scientists and academics share their reasons to be cheerful

Brockman's respondents were forward-looking, describing cutting-edge research that will help combat global warming and other looming problems.


How Doomed Are We?

Edgie's Chris Anderson of TED and Robert Provine of University of Maryland as the proponents of optimism on program concerning Optimism and the Doomsday Clock


a titillating compilation

Peering into their crystal telescopes, the world's leading scientists see a magnificent future

El foro virtual Edge propone buscar razones, no simplemente deseos, para el optimismo. Edge es un club que reúne, segén ellos mismos, algunas de las mentes más interesantes del mundo. Su propósito es estimular discusiones en las fronteras del conocimiento. La intención es llegar al borde del conocimiento mundial, acercándose a las mentes más complejas y refinadas, juntarlas en un foro y hacerlos que se pregunten las preguntas que ellos mismos se hacen. La fundación actúa, de este modo, como surtidora de problemas y alojamiento de réplicas. Cada ano se constituye como Centro Mundial de Preguntas.

God bless those upbeat scientists

Looking through rose-colored microscopes
Why some scientists are optimistic about the future

One way or another the answers should give you a warm glow — either because you agree, or because they make you angry.


Edge's future-themed article is making some news....

From the lips of contributors to the online magazine Edge to God's ears (one wonders if She or It may be listening): dozens of scientists and other thinkers have looked ahead to the future.


a Web site that aims to bridge the gap between scientists and other thinkers

[E]ven in the face of such threats as global warming and religious fundamentalism, scientists remain positive about the future.

People's fascination for religion and superstition will disappear within a few decades as television and the internet make it easier to get information, and scientists get closer to discovering a final theory of everything, leading thinkers argue today.

What are you optimistic about? Why? Tons of brilliant thinkers respond.
What Are You Optimistic About?
Posted by Hemos on Monday January 01, @08:43AM
from the explain-yourself dept.

Intellectual impresario John Brockman puts his annual Edge question to
leading thinkers.


What are you optimistic about? Intellectual impresario John Brockman puts his annual Edge question to leading thinkers...


[A]ccording to Edge — the heady website for world-class scientists and thinkers, and the brainchild of author and entrepreneurial idea man, John Brockman, there's good news ahead.

2006

"WHAT IS YOUR DANGEROUS IDEA?"



What Is Your Dangerous Idea
Edited by John Brockman
Introduction by Steven Pinker
Afterword by Richard Dawkins



KYUNG HANG
(Soeul)
The great world-wide scholars talk about their 'dangerous ideas'.


Most of the contributors appear to have interpreted "dangerous" as meaning something like "subversive," challenging to one or another received orthodoxy.

Meine gefährlichste Idee. Seit nunmehr neun Jahren startet die Stiftung Edge mit einer Umfrage zu einem großen generellen Thema ins neue Jahr.

Crónicas Bárbaras Ciencia racista, atractiva pero muy peligrosa.

(Sydney) Into the minds of the believers. With the aim of gathering ideas from the world's leading thinkers on intellectual, philosophical, artistic and literary issues, US writer John Brockman established The Edge Foundation in 1988.

Royal Society president Martin Rees said the most dangerous idea was public concern that science and technology were running out of control.

Audacious Knowledge. What is a dangerous idea? One not assumed to be false, but possibly true?What do you believe is true even though you cannot prove it?"

Seductive power of a hazardous idea. The responses to Brockman's question do not directly engage with each other, but they do worry away at a core set of themes.

Academics see gene cloning perils, untamed global warming and personality-changing drugs as presenting the gravest dangers for the future of civiliztion

Risky ideas; What do scientists currently regard as the most dangerous thoughts?


Be Afraid. Edge.org canvassed scientists for their "most dangerous idea." David Buss, a psychologist at the University of Texas, chose "The Evolution of Evil."

The most dangerous idea. Brockman's challenge is noteworthy because his buddies include many of the world's greatest scientists: Freeman Dyson, David Gelertner, J. Craig Venter, Jared Diamond, Brian Greene.

Dangerous Ideas About Modern Life. Free will does not exist. We are not always created equal. Science will never be able to address our deepest concerns.

Genome sequencing pioneer Craig Venter suggests greater understanding of how genes influence characteristics such as personality, intelligence and athletic capability could lead to conflict in society.

The wilder shores of creativity. He asked his roster of thinkers [...] to nominate an idea, not necessarily their own, they consider dangerous not because it is false, but because it might be true.

From cloning to predetermination of sex: the answers of investigators and philosophers to a question on the online salon Edge.

Who controls humans? God? The genes? Or nevertheless the computer? The on-line forum Edge asked its yearly question — and the answers raised more questions.

La pregunta de l'any. La web Edge.org penjarà l'1 de gener la pregunta de l'any. La del 2005 va ser resposta per 120 ments de l'anomenada 'tercera cultura', que van reflexionar sobre l'enunciat "Què creus que és veritat tot i no poder-ho demostrar?"

THE HANKYOREH (Seoul)

The 117 respondents include Richard Dawkins, Freeman Dyson, Daniel Dennett, Jared Diamond — and that's just the D's! As you might expect, the submissions are brilliant and very controversial.

Gene discoveries highlight dangers facing society. Mankind's increasing understanding of the way genes influence behaviour and the issue's potential to cause ethical and moral dilemmas is one of the biggest dangers facing society, according to leading scientists.

Why it can be a very smart move to start life with a Jewish momma: There is one dangerous idea that still trumps them all: the notion that, as Steven Pinker describes it, "groups of people may differ genetically in their average talents and temperaments". For "groups of people", read "races."

The Earth can cope with global warming, schools should be banned and we should learn to love bacteria. These are among the dangerous ideas revealed by a poll of leading thinkers.

Science can be a risky game, as Galileo learned to his cost. Now John Brockman asks over a hundred thinkers, "What is your most dangerous idea?"

"Our brains are constantly subjected to the demands of multi-tasking and a seemingly endless cacophony of information from diverse sources. "

Very complex systems — whether organisms, brains, the biosphere, or the universe itself — were not constructed by design; all have evolved. There is a new set of metaphors to describe ourselves, our minds, the universe, and all of the things we know in it.

John Brockman Blogs Edge's Annual Question on Huff Po


2005


"What Do You Believe Is True Even Though You Cannot Prove It?"



What We Believe but Cannot Prove: Today's Leading Thinkers on Science in the Age of Certainty
Edited by John Brockman

Introduction by Ian McEwan

The natural gift of consciousness should be treasured all the more for its transience.

The answers...exert an un- questionable morbid fascination — those are the very ideas that scientists cannot confess in their technical papers.

"Fate largo alle «beautiful minds» di Roberto Casati;;
"La terza cultura di John Brockman" di Armando Massarenti

God (or Not), Physics and, of Course, Love: Scientists Take a Leap: Fourteen scientists ponder everything from string theory to true love.

Space Without Time, Time Without Rest: John Brockman's Question for the Republic of Wisdom — It can be more t