|
|
|
|
[Photo The
New York literary agent John Brockman, 58, and Spiegel science editors Jörg Blech, 33, and Johann Grolle,
38, pursue a similar handiwork: they bring readers stories about cloned
sheep, dangerous epidemics, and the origins of the universe. The indomitable Brockman has fought to
reach the leading position in the world market for scientific books;
many important manuscripts pass over his desk in the heart of Manhattan
before they are sold to publishers for high sums.
When Blech and Grolle met the literary agent for an interview
with Der Spiegel, he
quickly asked, "Don't you have unpublished manuscripts in your
desk?" The editors rejected this unreasonable
demand, which wasn't meant in all seriousness. "Tear
down all of the statues!" The
New York literary agent John Brockman on the business of books about
science and scientists who as writers become stars. Speaking
about himself John Brockman declares, "Every ten years I have
an idea." Turned
down by 17 universities because of miserable grades, he has with luck
found a true place to study.
Just after receiving a business degree in the mid-sixties,
Brockman, now 58, went to New York with the idea of becoming an art
producer and impresario, and he began to organize film festivals.
In 1967 he, with some friends, opened a multimedia disco in
an airplane hangar, worked as a promoter in a company making feminine
hygiene products, and became a groupie of Andy Warhol.
A little later the man with the Italian felt hat dove into
an attempt to become an author, with only moderate success.
Still, writing brought him to his best idea: to become a literary
agent. On the difficult
market for books about natural science he often secures his clients,
writing scientists or science journalists, advances of six figures. Many of his authors become stars, like Daniel Goleman, whose
Emotional Intelligence has
up to this point sold more than 5 million copies.
Whether it be evolution, cosmology, artificial intelligence,
or the question of consciousness, if a book from the empire of science
becomes a bestseller Brockman is almost always lurking in the background. Because the internet is useful for his interests, he opened
a virtual salon three years ago in which scientists debate (www.edge.org). At the end of 1998, Brockman asked what the most important
invention of the last 2000 years was.
He compiled a few of the answers into a book that is now being
published by the Ullstein-Verlag.
Many of his publishing successes, however, have not been repeated
in Germany. Many a book that local publishers have
bought from him for 200,000 Marks found hardly more than a thousand
buyers here. SPIEGEL:
Mr. Brockman, what advice would you, as a literary agent, give
to a German scientist, say a biologist or physicist?
BROCKMAN:
Go to Stanford! But not to study biology or physics there. SPIEGEL:
Rather? BROCKMAN:
In order to become familiar with other sciences. Whoever wants to know what is important
today must go to America. Those
insitutes are as busy as beehives.
Everyone exchanges information.
Even before Daniel Dennett sends his newest manuscript to his
publisher, at least 50 colleagues have already read it and
not only philosophers, but also neuroscientists, robotics developers,
psychiatrists, and linguists. The authors with whom I work write their
books for colleagues in many, many other disciplines. And for that reason, they must use a language
that most everyone can understand. SPIEGEL:
And such a situation is successful only in the USA? BROCKMAN:
Such an exchange never takes place in Germany at the very least
because one is not permitted to ask questions before he turns 40 years
old. SPIEGEL:
Does that mean that you find German scientists to be uninteresting
as authors? BROCKMAN:
It may be that many German scientists are capable of writing a bestseller
with an edition of one million. But not many do so because they are anxious to pursue their
academic duties. SPIEGEL:
Don't many American scientists find popular science disreputable and
un-serious? BROCKMAN:
My goal is not the popularization of science, but to contribute to
making scientific research understandable to a wide audience.
These books, unlike textbooks, are intellectual adventures.
They touch on the most important questions of our times. SPIEGEL:
But many of your authors don't even do research anymore, but just
philosophize. BROCKMAN:
OK, so Richard Dawkins doesn't work in a laboratory anymore.
But he expresses more than just opinions about old opinions,
as happens in the literary world. Because in research, real work is accomplished.
At the end, for example, stands a cloned sheep.
And Dawkins has something to say about that, even if he himself
didn't carry out the experiment. SPIEGEL:
Does science through people like him become a sort of pop-event? BROCKMAN:
Why not? I went to Scotland
to meet the cloned sheep Dolly a very moving moment. Changes caused by science are unbelievable.
Soon it might be possible to sew a high-performance calculator
into my shirt and to activate it by the warmth of my body.
My authors are concerned precisely with such changes. SPIEGEL:
What was it that sparked your interest in science? BROCKMAN:
When I was in my mid-twenties I spent a lot of time together with
artists in New York. And
they read books by natural scientists. When I first encountered these researchers I noticed, "They
have an even greater thirst for knowledge than any famous intellectual
whom I met at the important New York parties."
I remember especially well an evening with the composer John
Cage. At some point he pulled a book on cybernetics
by Norbert Weiner out of his bag and suggested, "You have to
read this." This
book was central for the development of computers and had a great
impact on me. Science was full of ideas and questions;
the literary world wasn't. SPIEGEL:
Why should one read about science? Does doing so make humanity better, or
smarter? BROCKMAN:
No. The researchers don't
offer any answers about life that the guy at the sausage stand wouldn't
be ready to offer. But
they ask incredibly interesting questions. SPIEGEL:
For example? BROCKMAN: About the history of humanity, for example. One of my authors, Christopher Stringer in London, says that modern man spread out across the world from Africa beginning 100,000 years ago. Another, Milford Wolpoff from Michigan, suggests in contradiction to this idea the so-called Multiregional Hypothesis. According to this theory the original humans had already settled several continents a million years ago and began then to develop into the different races.
SPIEGEL:
In 1994 the book The Bell Curve created a great outrage by postulating the thesis that
blacks have genetically determined lower intelligence quotients as
whites. Would you take
on such a book as an agent? BROCKMAN:
I have not yet turned down an idea for politcal reasons.
Naturally I would have supported it.
In response several wonderful books appeared like Jared Diamond's
Guns, Germs, and Steel. Or take
Daniel Goleman's Emotional Intelligence: It was a huge success only because it said no to the
concept of race, and because it revealed the IQ to be a false, artificial
measure. SPIEGEL:
What do you think of "metaphysical" books. Frank Tipler's
The Physics of Immortality,
which is on your list, but doesn't have a lot to do with science. BROCKMAN:
Tipler extrapolates the laws of physics, and already other physicists
have come and shot him down. Another example is Rupert Sheldrakes, Dogs That Know When
Their Owners Are Coming Home. SPIEGEL:
In which he in all seriousness argues that dogs are clairvoyant. BROCKMAN:
A friend of mine, a physicist said to me, "If you take on this
book, I will never speak with you again." Also, Sir John Maddox, the former editor
of the magazine Nature condemned
Sheldrake's assertions even though Sheldrake has a background
as a reputable scientist. He studied at Cambridge. SPIEGEL:
And whoever studies there can profess any sort of nonsense? BROCKMAN:
I don't play judge. Sheldrake's
book is fascinating, and that's what counts for me. He presents experiments. SPIEGEL:
that were absolutely never published in a scientific journal worth
taking seriously. BROCKMAN:
Because of this he also encounters problems in the academic world.
In Oxford people leave the room when he comes in.
Many researchers develop an almost religious attachment to
their work. SPIEGEL:
Is science indebted to you in some way? BROCKMAN:
I don't think so. But
it's different with authors.
Before I came along, they earned almost nothing. Now they reach a much larger audience
and earn real money. Many
scientists in Europe don't have that pleasure. If that's really a mistake then I hereby apologize before the
entire continent
. SPIEGEL:
Do you have a recipe for success? What are the ingredients of a bestseller? BROCKMAN:
No one knows, and no one can find out until he has one.
Now, for example, we have another: "The Elegant Universe"
by Brian Greene. Every publisher, except for one said no.
It deals with so-called superstring theory, a kind of formula
for the universe that is so complicated that most of the experts themselves
don't understand it. So why should I try to understand it?
Brian is not only a physics professor, but also a very good-looking
type who also still acts. The New York Times Magazine published six pages about him. Then he was invited onto television
and suddenly his book stood at the top of the bestseller lists. The theme is new, and that is most important. SPIEGEL:
The book has also brought about much frowning among his colleagues.
Many people believe that he must decide: either a serious scientist
or a celebrity. BROCKMAN:
Don't forget: What we're discussing here is a house. Greene now lives in a nice house. SPIEGEL:
How many proposals do you turn down? BROCKMAN:
Nearly all of them. I
receive about ten packages a day. But only 50 to 60 books per year come out of it. We find new authors often at the recommendation
of older ones. Or I happen
across something interesting in the newspaper. An example was George Smoot with Wrinkles in Time. When I heard that he had made a kind of snapshot of
the big bang with satellites I jumped right on it. I was sitting in a hotel in Tokyo, read the headline and thought,
"Here goes my day."
I called Smoot up and flew directly back to New York. By the time I arrived, the proposal was
already lying on my desk. Above
all, it is important to be quick. SPIEGEL:
Smoot doesn't exactly work like a born writer. In such cases do you look for a ghostwriter? BROCKMAN:
Yes, of course. That time the typing came from Smoot himself. SPIEGEL:
What is it that decides if a theme lends itself to public debate? BROCKMAN:
When something in the world of science happens, I either know the
decisive person himself, or someone who knows him/her. Publishers, on the other hand, are only
looking to repeat yesterday's successes.
In doing so they forget the factor of time: what is sold today
was thought of by an author three years ago.
I'd rather concentrate on what's happening today. SPIEGEL:
According to your concept, is there a place for new, exciting debates
about science among researchers in the humanities? BROCKMAN:
I don't have anything against literature and culture.
But many literary people and philosophers are proud that they
don't understand science. I hate the smug smiles, when certain people
talk about science in certain New York circles. The physicist and Nobel Prize winner Murray Gell-Mann says,
"Many scientists might not know Shakespeare very well, but at
least they aren't proud of it."
The affectation that any person assumes when he calls himself
an intellectual is the problem. SPIEGEL:
Is there a way that the humanities and natural sciences might meet
one another? BROCKMAN:
Tear down all of the statues! When one goes for a walk here in Munich, one sees all of these
statues that remember death, violence, and war. All that these statues say to people in Munich or Berlin is,
"Be careful to honor your history!" You are a product of this building or this statue. Who is supposed to be able to break out
of this? Who is supposed
to be free to postulate new and visionary ideas? Original
article by Jörg Blech and Johann Grolle Translated by Chris Williams |
|
John Brockman, Editor and Publisher Copyright
© 2001 by Edge
Foundation, Inc |
|
| Top |
|