EDGE: HOW DEMOCRACY WORKS
The Third Culture


one-click
printer friendly version
Edge 78

 

HOW DEMOCRACY WORKS (OR WHY PERFECT ELECTIONS SHOULD ALL END IN TIES) [11.20.00]
By W. Daniel Hillis

Many people believe that democracy works by giving voters a chance to elect a candidate whose views match their own. Actually, this isn't true. In a perfectly functioning democracy, both candidates will appear equally imperfect, elections' voter turnout will often be low, and all elections will end in near ties. The illustrations below show why this is true. They also show why a two-party system is better than a many-party system. Voters are more likely to like their choice of candidates in a many-party system, but they are less likely to like the winner of the election.

Introduction

Danny Hillis, physicist and computer scientist, brings together, in full circle, many of the ideas circulating among third culture thinkers: Marvin Minsky's society of mind; Christopher G. Langton's artificial life; Richard Dawkins' gene's-eye view; the plectics practiced at Santa Fe. Hillis developed the algorithms that made possible the massively parallel computer. He began in physics and then went into computer science — where he revolutionized the field — and he brought his algorithms to bear on the study of evolution. He sees the autocatalytic effect of fast computers, which lets us design better and faster computers faster, as analogous to the evolution of intelligence. At MIT in the late seventies, Hillis built his "connection machine," a computer that makes use of integrated circuits and, in its parallel operations, closely reflects the workings of the human mind. In 1983, he spun off a computer company called Thinking Machines, which set out to build the world's fastest supercomputer by utilizing parallel architecture.

The massively parallel computational model is critical to an understanding of today's revolution in human communication. Hillis's computers, which are fast enough to simulate the process of evolution itself, have shown that programs of random instructions can, by competing, produce new generations of programs — an approach that may well lead to the first machine that truly "thinks." Hillis's work demonstrates that when systems are not engineered but instead allowed to evolve — to build themselves — then the resultant whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Simple entities working together produce some complex thing that transcends them; the implications for biology, engineering, and physics are enormous.

— JB

W. DANIEL (DANNY) HILLIS, physicist and computer scientist, is co-chairman of the Board of Directors of The Long Now Foundation, and co-founder of Applied Minds, Inc. Hillis pioneered the concept of parallel computers that is now the basis for most supercomputers. He co-founded Thinking Machines Corp., which was the first company to build and market such systems successfully.

He was named the first Disney Fellow in 1996, and, and served until recently as vice president of research and development at The Walt Disney Company. He is also an Adjunct Professor of MIT at the Media Laboratory, and is the author of The Pattern On The Stone: The Simple Ideas That Make Computers Work (ScienceMasters Series).

See Danny Hillis' Edge Bio Page


The Reality Club: Jaron Lanier


HOW DEMOCRACY WORKS (OR WHY PERFECT ELECTIONS SHOULD ALL END IN TIES)
By W. Daniel Hillis

Many people believe that democracy works by giving voters a chance to elect a candidate whose views match their own. Actually, this isn't true. In a perfectly functioning democracy, both candidates will appear equally imperfect, elections' voter turnout will often be low, and all elections will end in near ties. The illustrations below show why this is true. They also show why a two-party system is better than a many-party system. Voters are more likely to like their choice of candidates in a many-party system, but they are less likely to like the winner of the election.

For the purpose of illustration, let's assume that any issue can be boiled down to a single choice of a point on the political spectrum, from left to right. Of course, real issues are more complicated than this, but the general principles of democracy can be illustrated with just this simple caricature.